Cardiovascular: Angina, MI, palpitation, tachycardia
Central nervous system: Dizziness, lightheadedness, drowsiness, headache, vertigo, anxiety, depression, somnolence, fever
Dermatologic: Angioedema, rash
Endocrine & metabolic: Hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperuricemia
Gastrointestinal: Dyspepsia, gastroenteritis
Genitourinary: Hematuria
Neuromuscular & skeletal: Back pain, CPK increased, myalgia, paresthesia, weakness
Respiratory: Dyspnea, epistaxis, pharyngitis, rhinitis, upper respiratory tract infection
Miscellaneous: Diaphoresis (increased)
<1%, postmarketing, and/or case reports: Abnormal hepatic function, agranulocytosis, anemia, hepatitis, hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, leukopenia, neutropenia, pruritus, renal failure, renal impairment, rhinitis, sinusitis, thrombocytopenia, urticaria; rhabdomyolysis has been reported (rarely) with angiotensin-receptor antagonists
Lithium: Risk of toxicity may be increased by candesartan; monitor lithium levels.
NSAIDs: May decrease angiotensin II antagonist efficacy; effect has been seen with losartan, but may occur with other medications in this class; monitor blood pressure
Potassium-sparing diuretics (amiloride, spironolactone, triamterene): Increased risk of hyperkalemia.
Potassium supplements may increase the risk of hyperkalemia.
Trimethoprim (high dose) may increase the risk of hyperkalemia.
Food: Food reduces the time to maximal concentration and increases the Cmax.
Herb/Nutraceutical: Avoid dong quai if using for hypertension (has estrogenic activity). Avoid ephedra, yohimbe, ginseng (may worsen hypertension). Avoid garlic (may have increased antihypertensive effect).
Onset of action: 2-3 hours
Peak effect: 6-8 hours
Duration: >24 hours
Distribution: Vd: 0.13 L/kg
Protein binding: 99%
Metabolism: To candesartan by the intestinal wall cells
Bioavailability: 15%
Half-life elimination (dose dependent): 5-9 hours
Time to peak: 3-4 hours
Excretion: Urine (26%)
Clearance: Total body: 0.37 mL/kg/minute; Renal: 0.19 mL/kg/minute
Hypertension: Usual dose is 4-32 mg once daily; dosage must be individualized. Blood pressure response is dose-related over the range of 2-32 mg. The usual recommended starting dose of 16 mg once daily when it is used as monotherapy in patients who are not volume depleted. It can be administered once or twice daily with total daily doses ranging from 8-32 mg. Larger doses do not appear to have a greater effect and there is relatively little experience with such doses.
Congestive heat failure (unlabeled use): Target dose: 32 mg
Elderly: No initial dosage adjustment is necessary for elderly patients (although higher concentrations (Cmax) and AUC were observed in these populations), for patients with mildly impaired renal function, or for patients with mildly impaired hepatic function.
Dosage adjustment in hepatic impairment: No initial dosage adjustment required in mild hepatic impairment. Consider initiation at lower dosages in moderate hepatic impairment (AUC increased by 145%). No data available concerning dosing in severe hepatic impairment.
Because of the lack of effect on the response to bradykinin, angiotensin receptor blockers are less likely to be associated with nonrenin-angiotensin effects such as cough and angioedema. Because of a different site of action in comparison to ACE inhibitors, the angiotensin II antagonists do not cause increases in levels of bradykinin. These different sites of action have lead to the supposition that the ACE inhibitors and the angiotensin II antagonists may be used in combination for enhanced response. This possibility is currently being evaluated. The 2004 ACC/AHA STEMI guidelines suggest an angiotensin receptor blocker should be administered to STEMI patients who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors and who have either clinical or radiological signs of heart failure or LVEF <0.4.
Antman EM, Anbe SC, Alpert JS, et al, "ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)," Circulation, 2004, 110:588-636. Available at: http://www.circulationaha.org/cgi/content/full/110/5/588. Last accessed October 26, 2004.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al, "The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 Report," JAMA , 2003, 289(19):2560-71.
Conlin P, Moore T, Swartz S, et al, "Effect of Indomethacin on Blood Pressure Lowering by Captopril and Losartan in Hypertensive Patients," Hypertension , 2000, 36(3):461-5.
"Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Chronic Heart Failure. On Behalf of the Membership of the Advisory Council to Improve Outcomes Nationwide in Heart Failure," Am J Cardiol , 1999, 83(2A):1A-38A.
Hamroff G, Katz SD, Mancini D, et al, "Addition of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade to Maximal Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Improves Exercise Capacity in Patients With Severe Congestive Heart Failure," Circulation , 1999, 99(8):990-2.
"K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative," Am J Kidney Dis , 2002, 39(2 Suppl 2):1-246. Available at: http://www.kidney.org/professionals/doqi/kdoqi/toc.htm. Accessed August 1, 2003.
McInnes GT, O'Kane KP, Jonker J, et al, "The Efficacy and Tolerability of Candesartan Cilexetil in an Elderly Hypertensive Population," J Hum Hypertens , 1997, 11(Suppl 2):75-80.
McKelvie RS, Yusuf S, Pericak D, et al, "Comparison of Candesartan, Enalapril, and Their Combination in Congestive Heart Failure : Randomized Evaluation of Strategies for Left Ventricular Dysfunction (RESOLVD) Pilot Study: The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators," Circulation , 1999, 100(10):1056-64.
McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, et al, "Effects of Candesartan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Left-Ventricular Systolic Function Taking Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors: The CHARM-Added Trial," Lancet , 2003, 362(9386):767-71.
Morsing P, Adler G, Brandt-Eliasson U, et al, "Mechanistic Differences of Various AT1-Receptor Blockers in Isolated Vessels of Different Origin," Hypertension , 1999, 33(6):1406-13.
Reif M, White WB, Fagan TC, et al, "Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil in Patients With Systemic Hypertension. Candesartan Cilexetil Study Investigators," Am J Cardiol , 1998, 82(8):961-5.
Riegger GA, Bouzo H, Petr P, et al, "Improvement in Exercise Tolerance and Symptoms of Congestive Heart Failure During Treatment With Candesartan Cilexetil," Circulation , 1999, 100(22):2224-30.
Swedberg K, Pfeffer M, Granger C, et al, "Candesartan in Heart Failure - Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM): Rationale and Design. Charm-Programme Investigators," J Card Fail , 1999, 5(3):276-82.
Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al, "Effects of Candesartan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left-Ventricular Ejection Fraction: The CHARM-Preserved Trial," Lancet , 2003, 362(9386):777-81.
|
A.D.A.M., Inc. is accredited by URAC, also known as the American Accreditation HealthCare Commission (www.urac.org). URAC's accreditation program is the first of its kind, requiring compliance with 53 standards of quality and accountability, verified by independent audit. A.D.A.M. is among the first to achieve this important distinction for online health information and services. Learn more about A.D.A.M.'s editorial process . A.D.A.M. is also a founding member of Hi-Ethics (www.hiethics.com) and subscribes to the principles of the Health on the Net Foundation (www.hon.ch). |