Home > Medical Reference > Encyclopedia (English)

Toggle: English / Spanish

 

Video details

Please install flash player [ Flash player icon ] to see this video.

Related Content


 

Newborn screening tests - Results

Alternative Names

Infant screening tests; Neonatal screening tests

Normal Values:

Normal values for each screening test  may vary depending on how the test is performed.

What abnormal results mean:

An abnormal result means that the child should have additional testing to confirm or rule out the condition.

  • Reviewed last on: 9/6/2007
  • Alan Greene, M.D., F.A.A.P., Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine; Lucile Packard Children's Hospital; Chief Medical Officer, A.D.A.M., Inc., and Deirdre O’Reilly, M.D., M.P.H., Neonatologist, Division of Newborn Medicine, Children’s Hospital Boston and Instructor in Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

References

American College of Medical Genetics Newborn Screening Expert Group. Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system--executive summary. Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5 Pt 2):S296-307.

Graves JC, Miller KE, Sellers AD. Maternal serum triple analyte screening in pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2002 Mar 1;65(5):915-20.

Grosse SD, Boyle CA, Cordero JF. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Apr 15;71(8):1482, 1487.

Bryant KG, Horns KM, Longo N, Schiefelbein J. A primer on newborn screening. Adv Neonatal Care. 2004 Oct;4(5):306-17.

Carreiro-Lewandowski E. Newborn screening: an overview. Clin Lab Sci. 2002 Fall;15(4):229-38.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: Evaluation of Benefits and Risks and Recommendations for State Newborn Screening Programs. J Pediatr. 2005 Sep;147(3 Suppl):S1.

Grosse SD, Boyle CA, Botkin JR, et al. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004 Oct 15;53(RR-13):1-36.